Home      Democratic Values      Who We Are      How the Party is Organized      Calendar*     Officers*
Take Action!      Bookshelf      Springfield Township Watch      Dems in Office       Election Fraud      Viewpoints     
Links: Gov & Party
*       Links: News & Info, etc.*      Talking with Republicans         The Funny Side*


 

That this page even has to exist is a travesty.

Certainly there has always been election fraud, whether it was stolen ballot boxes or "sweetener" (money or booze) used to buy votes or just plain intentional miscounting.

But the advent of electronic voting machines makes it easy and untraceable.  It can be done under the guise of "maintenance."  It can be done at a distance.  And it can be done on a grand scale.  Some people even think that the "Help America Vote Act" which began implementation in 2002 under the Bush administration is really "Help America Vote Hacked."  Why would the administration devote so much money to this, when we've been voting all along relatively well, and so much else is crying out for money?

The News They Don't Report

The General Accounting Office's Report on Elections and Reliability of Electronic Voting that has been featured on this site for over a month, and which has been available since October, is not listed at all in the New York Times on a search for "'General Accounting Office' + Elections" in their search of their own archives. Their search engine helpfully offered to "Search Paid Death Notices and Paid Memorial Notices for +GAO +Elections."  Likewise, the Cincinnati Enquirer had no listings for it.

Yet the GAO Report to Congressional Requesters can be downloaded (looking pretty official) from a government site that is open to everyone ( Click here for GAO Report ).  This report is taken very seriously by those here in Ohio who are looking at election fraud.  It's not an easy read, and certainly not pleasant.  Here's the link to the article that describes it, which is entitled,  Powerful Government Accountability Office report confirms key 2004 stolen election findings, by Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman  October 26, 2005.
http://www.freepress.org/departments/display/19/2005/1529  
Be an activist! 
Send this article and/or the GAO report to everyone on your email list (no matter what their party affiliation — they need to know)!  The article includes a link to the GAO Report.
 


Some Relevant Links

http://www.blackboxvoting.org


http://www.electionline.org/  useful for info, don't always go for their view

http://www.votetrustusa.org/



                 

An April 10, 2008 article in PC World, the computer magazine, says the US presidential election in November can be hacked.  And they're computer people -- they should know!

Will the Next Election Be Hacked?  Fresh disasters at the polls - and new evidence from an industry
insider - prove that electronic voting machines can't be trusted, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. reports in the October issue of Rolling Stone. His report cites Hart InterCivic [the company that makes Hamilton County's scanners].  Hamilton County BOE officials assure us everything is fine...we can only wonder and hope — and vote.


http://www.alternet.org/stories/41483/— The "10 Worst Places to Vote" include Ohio more than once!  America's weak spots include machines that count backward, slice-and-dice districts...phone jamming and other dirty tricks.

Court victory lets preserved Ohio 2004 ballots tell new tales of theft and fraud as indictments and convictions mount among key players in th
e 2004 election.

 

Hacking into a Voting Machine, Changing the Vote Count from the Parking Lot

As Elections Near, Officials Challenge Balloting Security.  In Controlled Test, Results Are Manipulated in Florida System. [From the parking lot!] Article from the Washington Post.


Rigged Elections Not Taken Seriously Enough

Given the number of security patches that world-class programmers at Microsoft have had to release to correct major security flaws in their Windows operating systems, how could anyone argue that electronic voting systems are immune to drastic manipulation? The introduction of electronic voting has the potential to do as much good for American democracy as repealing the 13th Amendment would do for civil rights.  

 
Democracies like those in England and France rely on hand-counted paper ballots to ensure fairness, and Americans of all political persuasions should insist on nothing less than the same degree of transparency and security in our own elections.  Especially in an era of rampant political corruption and extremism (White House secrecy/dishonesty, the vindictive leaking of Valerie Plame's identity, disregard for U.S. and international law; recent criminal investigation/indictment of many members of Congress; debates on whether or not we can/should torture people, etc.), there is no reason to entrust the electoral process (in any part of the country) to electronic systems that can be readily manipulated by an individual, party, corporation or group of like-minded people.  Open, hand-counting of paper ballots in the presence of representatives from all competing parties is by far the best way to forestall the demise of fair, democratic elections in the United States. 
 
Many Americans consider fair elections and our present degree of freedom to be an immutable birthright.  Unfortunately, there's ample reason to believe that that attitude is tragically naive.

— Bob Pohowsky


 



Home      Democratic Values      Who We Are      How the Party is Organized      Calendar*     Officers*
Take Action!      Bookshelf      Springfield Township Watch      Dems in Office       Election Fraud      Viewpoints     
Links: Gov & Party
*       Links: News & Info, etc.*      Talking with Republicans         The Funny Side*